All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Paradoxes
On the house? (Posted on 2003-10-31) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Alan and Bob each own a bar. Alan's is in very northern New York, and Bob's is just across the border in Canada.

As it turns out, at the beginning of this problem, a Canadian Dollar is worth exactly the same as the U.S. Dollar, and people are quite accustomed to using them interchangeably (including banks).

But, alas, the U.S. Government and the Canadian government get in a spat. So, the U.S. "devalues" the Canadian dollar 10%, so now they will treat it as worth 90 cents (U.S. currency). In retaliation, Canada does the same and "devalues" the U.S. dollar 10%, so they treat it as worth 90 cents (Canadian currency).

Enter Charlie.

Charlie goes to Alan's bar and purchases a 1 dollar drink and pays with a 10 dollar bill (U.S.). He receives, in change, a 10 dollar bill (Canadian). He then walks across the border to Bob's bar and purchases another 1 dollar drink, paying with a 10 dollar bill (Canadian), and he receives, in change, a 10 dollar bill (U.S.).

Charlie proceeds to continue doing this until he finds himself quite intoxicated.

I think it obvious that Charlie is gaining on these transactions. The question is.... WHO (if anyone) is losing out on these transactions?

See The Solution Submitted by SilverKnight    
Rating: 3.7619 (21 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
The governments/banks lose. | Comment 12 of 25 |
I believe it was Marc Meyer who gave the correct solution; the governments are picking up the tab. Many responders presumed a lot of circumstantial info, such as that "the bar already had a stockpile of foreign currency which was obtained at the former 1:1 cost basis." Nowhere in the problem was a loss via cost basis implied. If a Canadian bar is giving US currency as change, there is no reason to assume that they are not getting it from a local bank that day, at the current exchange rate. Otherwise there is no limit to the bar's "loss" you could infer with your imagination. Maybe they had $11.11M US stockpiled under the bar, and lost $1M as they frittered it all away as change for CAN$.

In reality whoever actually changes the currency from one form to another loses. This would be the banks, which are essentially the government.

No matter how much cash you can wheedle through this obviously stupid system, ultimately it is the government who eats it, if the exchange rates never change again.

Think of the most extreme example possible. Let's say there were 1 billion US dollars and 1.11 billion Canadian dollars EXISTING in print. What if someone took every single US dollar and exchanged them for 1.11B $CAN? Then they took the 1.11B $CAN and exchanged them back into $US? The government would be forced to print more money to honor the exchange. Yes, this inflates the economy and devalues the US dollar (theoretically.)

Bottom line is, the buck stops (literally) with the US Treasury and their Canadian equivalent.
  Posted by John on 2003-11-05 16:48:49
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (3)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information