All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Just Math
J.H. Lambert, I presume ? (Posted on 2019-05-24) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Solve analytically:

e^x=x+3

If you do not know how - the title of this puzzle might guide you.

No Solution Yet Submitted by Ady TZIDON    
No Rating

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution No Subject Comment 1 of 1
If we call the Lambert function w elementary, this can indeed be solved analytically. w is defined as the inverse of x -> x*e^x and has branches w_0 and w_-1 in the real numbers.

e^x = x+3
<=>
e^-3*e^(x+3) = x+3
<=>  
-e^-3 = -(x+3)*e^-(x+3)

Now apply the w function on both sides:

w_i(-e^-3) = -(x+3), i=0,-1
<=>
x = -3-w_i(-e^-3), i=0,-1

I am not showing you the numerical values, we seek, after all, an analytical solution.

Edited on January 23, 2020, 12:36 pm
  Posted by JLo on 2020-01-23 12:34:40

Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (23)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information