All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Just Math
Piling Stones (Posted on 2023-12-23) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Tom, Dick and Harry piled stones into a pyramid to my precise specifications. Fred, an efficiency expert carefully watched them.

When the pyramid was complete, Fred reported that if Tom had worked twice as fast the job would have taken exactly 2 hours less, if Dick had worked three times as fast the job would have taken exactly 3 hours less, and if Harry had worked four times as fast the job would have taken exactly 4 hours less.

How long had the job taken?

See The Solution Submitted by K Sengupta    
Rating: 5.0000 (1 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Some Thoughts Beginning of analytic solution; incomplete | Comment 2 of 5 |
This is an attempt at an analytic solution without Wolfram Alpha; so far, I have an expression for t in terms of a,b,c; this formula works correctly with Charlie's numbers.

a,b,c are in units per hour corresponding to Tom, Dick, and Harry.
It is apparent from the text that Harry is the fastest worker, we expect:  a < b < c
and that t > 4 (t being the time to do the job when they all worked normally)

W = (a + b + c)t
W = (2a + b + c)(t-2)
W = (a + 3b + c)(t-3)
W = (a + b + 4c)(t-4)

subtract first from each of the others:
(2a + b + c)t - 2(2a + b + c) - (a + b + c)t = 0
(a + 3b + c)t - 3(a + 3b + c) - (a + b + c)t = 0
(a + b + 4c)t - 4(a + b + 4c) - (a + b + c)t = 0

 at = 2(2a + b + c)
2bt = 3(a + 3b + c)
3ct = 4(a + b + 4c)

add all 3 new eqns
(a + 2b + 3c)t = 11a + 15b + 21c
t = (11a + 15b + 21c) / (a + 2b + 3c) <---  formula for t
(so I don't have a value for t, just a formula)

When I plug my 4 simultaneous equations into Wolfram, I get the same numbers as Charlie:
t≈7.83815 + 0 i
c≈(0.0443204 + 0 i)
b≈(0.0395547 + 0 i)  <-- expect b>a but b<a
a≈(0.043706 + 0 i)
Reassuringly, when I plug these a,b,c values into this formula, I do get the same value for time.
But looking at the values for a,b,c coming from Wolfram, 
it is not true that a < b < c 
which is puzzling...

  Posted by Larry on 2023-12-23 14:43:51
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (4)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (14)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information