All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Just Math
Another Divisibility Puzzle (Posted on 2006-09-25) Difficulty: 4 of 5
Determine the four smallest but different three digit positive decimal integers commencing with the same digit, such that their sum is divisible by precisely three of the said numbers.

What are the five smallest but different four digit positive decimal integers commencing with the same digit, such that their sum is divisible by precisely four of the said numbers?

  Submitted by K Sengupta    
Rating: 4.0000 (1 votes)
Solution: (Hide)
(108, 117, 135, 180) constitutes the solution for Part I.

(1020, 1190, 1428, 1717, 1785) constitutes the solution for Part II.

EXPLANATION:

At the outset, for the sum to be divisible by M of the M+1 different numbers making up the sum, it must be a different multiple of each of these numbers. But the numbers have the same number of digits and start with the same digit, so the largest is less than twice the smallest. The sum is therefore less than 2M+1 times the smallest and larger than 1 + M/2 times the largest.

But in practice, we cannot use a sum less than M times the largest, because there must be M different multiples within a range of less than a factor of 2. If M-1 is included, 2M-2 and larger multiples cannot be, and the number of different multiples M-1, M, ..., 2M-3 is only M-1 numbers. And likewise we cannot have both M and 2M in our set. So we have either M through 2M-1 or M+1 through 2M as our multiples.

Part I: M =3

For M=3, we must have a sum multiples of either 3, 4, 5 or 4, 5, 6 of three of our numbers.

Case A: The multiples are 3, 4, 5

For sum S, the numbers are S/3, S/4, S/5, and S-S/3-S/4-S/5 = 13S/60. Alternatively, we have 12k, 13k, 15k, and 20k with sum 60k. The smallest solution is from k=9: 108 + 117 + 135 + 180 = 540

Case B: The multiples are 4, 5, 6

The numbers are S/4, S/5, S/6, and S-S/4-S/5-S/6 = 23S/60. Since this last number is more than twice S/6, there is no solution in this category.

Consequently, (108, 117, 135, 180) constitutes the solution for Part I.

Part II : M =4

For M=4, the multiples are either 4, 5, 6, 7 or 5, 6, 7, 8.

Case A: The multiples are ( 4, 5, 6, 7)

The numbers are S/4, S/5, S/6, S/7 and S-S/4-S/5-S/6 - S/7 = 101S/420. The numbers are 60k, 70k, 84k, 101k, and 105k. The smallest solution is for k=17: 1020 + 1190 + 1428 + 1717 + 1785 = 7140.

Case B : The multiples are (5, 6, 7, 8)

The last number is 307 S / 840, which is larger than twice S/8, so there is no solution in this category.

Consequently, (1020, 1190, 1428, 1717, 1785) constitutes the solution for Part II.

Addendum: If we remove the "smallest" restriction, then substituting
k = 18 and 19 in Part II (Case- A) we obtain two additional sets for Part II, which are:
(1080, 1260, 1512, 1818, 1890) and (1140, 1330, 1596, 1919, 1995).

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
re: General Observation -- program bugCharlie2006-09-26 23:05:17
General ObservationK Sengupta2006-09-25 23:48:36
Solutionre: part 2: the only one -- part 1 variantCharlie2006-09-25 14:51:40
Solutionpart 2: the only oneCharlie2006-09-25 14:37:59
solution (part 2)Justin2006-09-25 13:45:01
solution (part I)Justin2006-09-25 12:01:13
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (19)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information