All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Numbers
Infinitely Continued III (Posted on 2010-02-04) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Evaluate:

√(6+2√(7+3√(8+4√(9+5√(10+ ....)))))

No Solution Yet Submitted by K Sengupta    
Rating: 4.0000 (1 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re: Is my reasoning valid? Spoiler | Comment 4 of 7 |
(In reply to Is my reasoning valid? by Jer)

I think youre right Jer; for integers >=0 your inspired function, f(x), is just x in disguise.
To get round the singularity that Steve mentions, and find f(3), I believe we can use the first derivative as follows:

(x - 2) f(x + 1) = f(x)2 - x - 2      (1)  This can be differentiated to give

(x - 2) f(x + 1) + f(x + 1) = 2 f(x) f(x) - 1

Using x = 0, 1 and 2, this equation gives

-2 f(1) + f(1) = 2 f(0) f(0) - 1                (2)
    -f(2) +f(2) = 2 f(1) f(1) - 1                (3)
              f(3) = 2 f(2) f(2) - 1                 (4)

We know that f(0)=0, f(1)=1 and f(2)=2 by direct substitution into your formula, so

(2) gives           f(1) = 1
(3) then gives    f(2) = 1
(4) then gives    f(3) = 3

x=3 in (1) then gives   f(4) = 32 -3 - 2 = 4, which solves the problem.

_________________

I think this may pave the way to an inductive proof that f(x) = x for all positive integers. Im not sure what happens between the integers, but my plotting software suggests something very interesting... (not had time to explore yet).

  Posted by Harry on 2010-02-05 08:57:46

Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (10)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2017 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information