All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Numbers
Ordering Pairs (Posted on 2004-11-06) Difficulty: 3 of 5
What are the smallest positive integers A, B, C, and D such that A+A > A+B > A+C > B+B > B+C > A+D > C+C > B+D > C+D > D+D ?

Note: Of all solutions, choose the one with the smallest A, then smallest B if there are more than one with the smallest A, etc.

See The Solution Submitted by Brian Smith    
Rating: 3.7500 (4 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution Solution and Logic | Comment 9 of 10 |

First D=1 is deduced to be the lowest integer, and it is 1. To me, it is easier to start from here and work upwards. With logic done correctly, the results should be no different than working from the other way.

If D=1, then C must be at least 3. There are 2 integers between C+C and D+D. D+D=2, so C+C can't be five.

Similar logic, implies B=5 and A=7. It also follows that when ever a lower value is increased, the next value must be increased as well to maintain a distance of at least 2 integers.

So A,B,C,D = 7,5,3,1. However, B+D is now = C+C, so the value of C must be increased. We now have A,B,C,D = 8,6,4,1.

Now A+C = B+B. Try to increase A, so we have. A,B,C,D = 9,6,4,1. But now, B+C = A+D. So C must be increased. We now have A,B,C,D = 9,7,5,1.

Still A+C = B+B.  A must be increased once again. Finally it works. A,B,C,D = 10,7,5,1


  Posted by Michael on 2004-11-26 23:13:39
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (3)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information