All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
At the Olympic Games (6) (Posted on 2004-09-27) Difficulty: 2 of 5
Argentine, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic and Equator competed at the Olympic Games, placing first through fifth in an event. They said:

Argentine: "I was not last."
Brazil: "Canada got the bronze."
Canada: "Argentine ended behind Equator."
Dominican Republic: "Equator got silver."
Equator: "Dominican Republic didn't get gold."

The gold and silver winners lied, but the other three told the truth. How did the event end?

See The Solution Submitted by Federico Kereki    
Rating: 2.6923 (26 votes)

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
SolutionFull Explanation to Problem SolutionK Sengupta2022-07-21 12:58:09
SolutionI getFrankM2008-05-13 07:27:12
SolutionProblem SolutionK Sengupta2007-05-04 12:07:13
SolutionanswerClara Levy2005-02-07 19:59:55
answerjuan m. perez2005-02-04 22:59:17
solutionwhome?2005-01-23 18:36:30
SolutionMalorie2004-11-20 19:15:13
Solutioncezar2004-11-18 16:16:32
No SubjectMalvika2004-10-20 02:04:37
got itkelly2004-10-19 17:11:27
SolutionBradley2004-10-16 23:35:07
solutionMichelle2004-10-16 16:34:14
my theoryFranky2004-10-15 09:54:27
SolutionCraig2004-10-12 00:32:22
re: SolutionBarb2004-10-11 16:01:45
SolutionSolutionAmanda2004-10-10 02:44:46
solution, I think.Sarah2004-10-08 19:38:21
re: The Actualnikki2004-10-08 09:33:50
The Actualtresspasser2004-10-08 09:14:59
re(2): Kathy EdmondsKatie Edwards2004-10-08 07:52:27
Some Thoughtssolution i thinksubhojit saha2004-10-07 16:59:42
re: Kathy Edmondsnikki2004-10-05 17:39:50
Kathy EdmondsKatie Edwards2004-10-05 17:03:30
Blame CanadaRandyOrton2004-10-05 11:00:40
solutionDetti Herman2004-10-04 15:16:59
QuestionKatie Edwards = Eagle Eye (? for Frederico!)nikki2004-10-04 14:46:27
Columbia or Canada?Katie Edwards2004-10-04 14:24:04
hardtheo2004-10-03 16:15:45
re: Solution - with explanation - Can please some one verify approach?Federico Kereki2004-10-02 05:01:16
re: Nikkinikki2004-10-01 15:34:50
Solution - with explanation - Can please some one verify approach?vineet jain2004-10-01 04:33:01
re: No Subject - Davenikki2004-09-30 16:59:00
re(2): Uh, Hello?nikki2004-09-30 16:57:43
re: Uh, Hello?Andrea2004-09-30 16:17:26
re: Alternate Solution?snow2004-09-30 10:44:58
Some ThoughtsAlternate Solution?snow2004-09-30 10:43:01
No Subjectdave2004-09-28 08:45:30
Solutionsolutiondave2004-09-28 08:43:32
SolutionEasy funRuth2004-09-27 18:30:47
NikkiRandyOrton2004-09-27 15:42:03
re: Wownikki2004-09-27 15:38:02
Solutionre: Uh, Hello?nikki2004-09-27 15:29:05
Uh, Hello?RandyOrton2004-09-27 13:34:18
SolutionAnswer (fully explained)Old Original Oskar!2004-09-27 12:15:58
WowRandyOrton2004-09-27 10:52:17
Special NoteRandyOrton2004-09-27 10:28:09
SolutionI am so smartRandyOrton2004-09-27 10:25:10
SolutionSolutionDavid Shin2004-09-27 10:22:39
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (3)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information