All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Paradoxes
Hell Hath No Fury ... (Posted on 2007-04-12) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Desperate David has undertaken a dangerous desert trek rather than marry either of his current girlfriends. So each girlfriend (unaware of the others actions) sabotaged his reserve water supply.

Debra added a quick-acting poison while Dana punctured the barrel, allowing all of the poisoned water to run away.

One week later David died from dehydration.


  • When arrested Debra claimed she was innocent because even though she poisoned the water David did not drink any.
  • Dana claimed she was not guilty because puncturing the barrel had stopped David from dying sooner from the poison. Her action made him live longer.
  • They cannot be charged jointly since they acted independently

  • Who, if anyone, should be charged with what crime?

    See The Solution Submitted by Vernon Lewis    
    Rating: 3.0000 (2 votes)

    Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
      Subject Author Date
    what crime?Saggin2008-02-05 04:47:09
    water girlfriend desert poison puncture scenarioCleo2007-08-05 12:00:52
    re: LassiterVernon Lewis2007-04-15 07:54:53
    Lassiterbrianjn2007-04-15 05:29:17
    Solution2 Angry WomenPenny2007-04-13 19:59:09
    Some ThoughtsNo oasis, only the mirage....Dej Mar2007-04-12 13:00:35
    SolutionNo paradoxOld Original Oskar!2007-04-12 12:16:32
    Some ThoughtsOne Juror's opinionSteve Herman2007-04-12 10:36:41
    Where is Guilt?brianjn2007-04-12 10:00:19
    Please log in:
    Remember me:
    Sign up! | Forgot password

    Search body:
    Forums (0)
    Newest Problems
    Random Problem
    FAQ | About This Site
    Site Statistics
    New Comments (3)
    Unsolved Problems
    Top Rated Problems
    This month's top
    Most Commented On

    Copyright © 2002 - 2019 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information