All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Paradoxes
Hell Hath No Fury ... (Posted on 2007-04-12) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Desperate David has undertaken a dangerous desert trek rather than marry either of his current girlfriends. So each girlfriend (unaware of the others actions) sabotaged his reserve water supply.

Debra added a quick-acting poison while Dana punctured the barrel, allowing all of the poisoned water to run away.

One week later David died from dehydration.

However:

  • When arrested Debra claimed she was innocent because even though she poisoned the water David did not drink any.
  • Dana claimed she was not guilty because puncturing the barrel had stopped David from dying sooner from the poison. Her action made him live longer.
  • They cannot be charged jointly since they acted independently

  • Who, if anyone, should be charged with what crime?

    See The Solution Submitted by Vernon Lewis    
    Rating: 3.0000 (2 votes)

    Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
    Some Thoughts One Juror's opinion | Comment 2 of 9 |
    Not much question in my mind.

    Dana is guilty of murder.  Her premeditated action led directly to David's death, in exactly the manner and in exactly the timeframe that she intended.  The fact that she thwarted an earlier death is of no import, especially because she did so unintentionally.  Even if the thwarting were intentional, though, it is no defence.  (What if, for instance, Debra planted a bomb timed to go off in 30 minutes, Dana defused the bomb, and Dana then punctured the barrel?  Dana canot defend herself of the puncturing by saying that she defused the bomb.)

    The only way Dana's defense works is if (a) she was aware of the poisoning, and (b) puncturing the barrel was the only way to save or extend his life, and (c) she punctured the barrel with the intent of saving or extending his life.  These three elements, all of which are required for the defense, are all contrafactual.

    Oh, and Debra is guilty of attempted murder.  She got off lucky, in more ways than one (David sounds like a Loser).

    Edited on April 12, 2007, 10:42 am

    Edited on April 12, 2007, 10:43 am
      Posted by Steve Herman on 2007-04-12 10:36:41

    Please log in:
    Login:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Sign up! | Forgot password


    Search:
    Search body:
    Forums (0)
    Newest Problems
    Random Problem
    FAQ | About This Site
    Site Statistics
    New Comments (8)
    Unsolved Problems
    Top Rated Problems
    This month's top
    Most Commented On

    Chatterbox:
    Copyright © 2002 - 2017 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information