Proof (Posted on 2002-05-29)

	Submitted by Half-Mad
Rating: 3.6667 (9 votes)
Solution:	(Hide)
3.9999... = X 3.9999... * 10 = 39.9999.... = 10X 10X - 3.9999... = 9X 39.9999... - 3.9999... = 36 = 9X 36 / 9 = 9X / 9 = 4 therefore, X = 4

	Subject	Author	Date
	Puzzle Solution: Method 3	K Sengupta	2022-02-18 23:21:09
	Equivalent	Bractals	2007-11-14 16:11:50
	By Calculus	K Sengupta	2007-11-14 03:57:50
	A Different Method	K Sengupta	2007-03-24 11:48:28
	re: doin my part to balance the playing field	Percy	2005-11-15 19:16:32
	re: Thoughts of P	Percy	2005-11-15 18:46:42
	Thoughts of P	CeeAnne	2005-11-15 13:30:20
	re: Illegal Operations - my take on it	brad	2005-10-25 23:35:17
	re: Illegal Operations	Josh70679	2005-10-20 17:27:21
	doin my part to balance the playing field	Josh70679	2005-10-20 17:23:01
	re: P	owl	2005-10-17 22:20:00
	P	Percy	2005-10-17 20:40:08
	Illegal Operations	Eric	2005-08-01 15:22:23
	i dont think you got it.	nate	2005-02-04 02:06:18
	re: ...horseshoes and grenades	Dan	2005-01-07 16:33:10
	...horseshoes and grenades	Jack Squat	2003-12-31 15:12:11
	re(3): solution is wrong	Federico Kereki	2003-11-28 23:45:27
	re(3): solution is wrong	Tristan	2003-11-28 14:39:56
	re(2): solution is wrong	Victor Zapana	2003-11-28 08:39:33
	re: solution is wrong	Tristan	2003-11-28 00:49:17
	re(4): Ideas	SilverKnight	2003-11-27 12:28:58
	solution is wrong	Victor Zapana	2003-11-27 11:29:41
	re(3): Ideas	Gamer	2003-11-27 10:49:48
	re: more thoughts	Gamer	2003-11-27 10:48:28
	more thoughts	Tristan	2003-11-16 15:47:57
	re(2): Ideas	SilverKnight	2003-11-16 13:03:20
	re: Ideas	Tristan	2003-11-15 10:29:59
	Ideas	Gamer	2003-11-15 07:42:07
	re(4): alternate proof	SilverKnight	2003-10-02 18:28:42
	re(3): alternate proof	Tristan	2003-10-02 17:39:00
	re(2): alternate proof	SilverKnight	2003-10-02 13:06:38
	re: alternate proof	Gamer	2003-10-02 07:22:12
	alternate proof	Tristan	2003-10-01 21:10:08
	re: Problem with 2 Solutions	Jim C	2003-07-18 05:52:30
	Problem with 2 Solutions	Gamer	2003-04-11 15:14:20
	re: hehe	Gamer	2003-03-09 14:46:52
	hehe	James	2002-10-26 17:53:46
	re: 1 = 0 ???	TomM	2002-08-24 09:58:46
	1 = 0 ???	Dulanjana	2002-08-24 04:19:32
	re:	TomM	2002-08-01 07:52:42
	re:	levik	2002-07-31 11:15:22
	No Subject	bill cochran	2002-07-31 09:48:56
	re: Then...	TomM	2002-06-08 12:36:07
	Then...	Dulanjana	2002-06-04 04:53:48
	Proof	TomM	2002-05-30 11:24:12